On 5th June, 2013 Nawaz Sharif became the
first politician in Pakistan’s parliamentary history to make it to the office
of prime minister for a third time. The whole world was keen to know what
strategies this newly elected yet experienced prime minister would adopt to
salvage the country in its troubled times. Among many other topics related to
current affairs, one which was analyzed and debated the most by
TV anchormen, newspaper columnists and analysts was about the factors
important for the development of a country. A country is assessed on how it
caters for its most vulnerable citizens. Most people were of the view that the
key factor for the development of a country is the provision of education.
However, some experts seemed to disagree with the popular perspective. Even
though some say education is the most significant factor in the development of
a country, however, factors such as history, politics, economics and
environment are more significant.
One of the major contributing factors to the level of
development of a country is its history. Countries which had a strong position
in the past have enhanced capabilities to climb up the ladder of development
with relative ease as compared to newly founded countries. These countries have
a chance to learn from their past mistakes and progress easily in the rapidly
developing world. China, for example, carries the heavy weight
of history on its back. China takes immense pride in its hoary history and
civilization. China believes that it can now eclipse the other superpowers and
once again restore its position as one of the strongest
and most developed nations in the world. WTO confirmed that
China is the world’s main exporter. Therefore, it is seen that the reason for
China being one of the rapidly developing countries is its history and the
strong will of the inhabitants to progress in order to regain the former
prestige.
The political framework of a country, often linked closely
to its history, also plays a noteworthy role when it comes to development of a
country. The political factors are significant because they are responsible for
the progression as well as hindrance towards development. What is it that
that Brazil, Ghana, Uganda, Bangladesh, India and Turkey did to sustain
development? Every one of these countries did not leave development to chance.
Through pro-poor policies and high investment in other merit goods these
countries have managed to open up globally. The governments of all these countries
made the necessary and sufficient decisions for their respective country’s
progress. These countries made the right policies and devised methods to govern
their institutions effectively. The politics of a country can prove to be both
beneficial as well as disastrous. An example is Nigeria. It has been labelled
as the one of the most corrupt countries in the world by BBC. When the
governments are corrupt it is less likely that there will be any investments
made in the developmental projects. Yes, there are shortfalls and hypocritical
masks in politics, but every government is answerable to the citizens. Every
developed nation is in its current position because its governments, one after
the other, took the responsibility of carrying out development strategies.
The gist of development is truly grasped when it is
discussed in terms of economy. The world witnessed large-scale development
after the Industrial Revolution in UK in the late 19th century.
This giant leap towards development was due to the economic factors. A similar
example can be extracted from Pakistan’s history. During the military rule of
President Ayub Khan (1958-69), Pakistan made the most economic growth
than it had ever in the past. This is why his eleven year rule is known as the
“Decade of Development”.
It is often argued that education is the most important tool
for the development of a country. People who are of this view generally claim
education is exactly what led to “The Age of Enlightenment” in the early 17th century.
Education, it is said, is like a pool of mercury. Hit it with a hammer and you
end up with ten little blobs of mercury instead of one. It leads to envisioning
and critical thinking of multiple minds. It broadens the horizon of how people
think. Education not only helps to acknowledge the complexities but also helps
to find appropriate solutions to these problems. People insist that it is
because of education that people are able to comprehend the problems pertaining
to a country and come up with apt solutions and strategies for development. It
is to be noted that if education was the single most important factor in the
development of a country, then the countries with the highest literacy rates
should be amongst the list of the most developed countries in the world. However,
this is not the case. Canada has the highest literacy rate, 51 percent, in the
world followed by Israel which has a literacy rate of 46 percent. Had education
been the most important factor, these two countries would have been the most
developed countries in the world. In fact Canada and Israel do not even fall
among the top ten most developed countries of the world.
All in all, one has to shun the stereotypical notion of the
“revolutionaries” that education is the single most important factor in
developing a country. It is time for the revolutionaries to realise that
relying solely on educating the citizens of a country is not the solution. This
path is not a straight line and it is not as simple as it seems. It is more
like a jagged edge. Therefore, it is time to look ahead, time to mature, time
to be practical, and time to broaden the horizon of minds of people. Education
is not the solitary factor which will result in developing a country; instead
there are multiple other factors such as history, politics, economics and
environment, which pave way for success of a country in all aspects.
Excellent post Mishal. This is a synthesis of a lot of different topics and looks to both the past and future. A few points.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, I think that you conflate "education" with "literary" and then make the jump to say that literacy=development. The causal logic in this entire chain is off. I think that education does decrease illiteracy and this helps societies develop. To what extent, that remains debatable. But there is no doubt that an educated populace helps improve a country in multiple ways. And the statistics you cite for literacy are off (see here for more accurate statistics: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/).
Next, it has nearly been two-years since Sharif was elected, how do you evaluate his performance thus far?
Finally, is Pakistan headed in the right direction? We are seeing stronger economic growth, but there remains a whole plethora of other problems that remain unaddressed.
Thanks for blogging - it's been great reading your work :)