Immanuel Wallerstein in this essay has traced the history of Capitalism
and has provided detailed information on how Capitalism advanced. From 16th
century onwards many changes took place such as the Industrial Revolution which
made the rise of Capitalism more probable as large markets were needed to supply
the goods that were being produced rapidly.
He puts forth the idea of the ‘World-Systems
Theory’. This theory is a reflection of how the capitalist system is organized
and how it functions in the real world. According to this, the world is divided
into three main types of nations; core countries, semi-periphery
countries, and the periphery countries. The core countries are those countries
which are developed, technologically advanced, have a more skilled workforce
and engage in capital intensive production. They purchase raw materials from
the periphery nations and then manufacture goods in their own. They then sell
these goods back at higher prices to the same nations. From this we can then
deduce the function of the periphery countries, which is to provide the basic
raw materials and agricultural goods to the core nations. On the other hand the
semi- periphery countries also engage in low-skill and labor-intensive
production, but at times can also use capital intensive techniques. This results
in a transfer of wealth from the periphery to the core and it gives rise to
hegemons like the US. They use cheap raw material from these countries and then
engage in trade to sell their goods in the markets of the peripheral nations.
Furthermore, the World- Systems Theory can be seen as a
prototype of the actual capitalist system that prevails in many countries. Just
like the Core nations exploit the rest of the world, the Bourgeoisie exploit
the Proletariat. It is the workers that produce the goods, however, they are
paid as little as the capitalists can get away with and the rest of the surplus
in reinvested into the capitalist system. Therefore, we see the level of
inequality between the capitalists and workers rising. Similarly we can see the
level of inequality between the core and periphery nations rising as well which
shows that Wallerstein's theory is a mere reflection of the capitalist system
itself.
Nonetheless, Marx predicted that eventually the capitalist
system would come to an end as the workers would come out of the state of false
consciousness and revolt. However, countries where such revolutions did take
place were not true communist nations as the state never ‘withered’ away. Although
it is difficult to make conclusions about whether or not capitalism is the best
form of system, we can say that perhaps there is something inherently strong
about the way capitalism works because despite its flaws it is still surviving
today.
I agree that it is difficult to conclude whether capitalism is a good system or not. One reason why the proletariat revolution, which Marx predicted, never came about was because the proletariat of the core and periphery states are very different. Their varying standards of living does not give them a sense of unity which ultimately does not give rise to a global shift towards communism and socialism. In fact, the proletariat becomes co opted into the system.
ReplyDeleteGood points Zoha and capitalism has had a remarkable degree of staying power. Also, good point Mariyam and I would just add that Marx underestimated the power of nationalism. Nationalism trumps economic solidarity, hence why the proletariat of the world never in fact united.
ReplyDeleteAs Zoha pointed out that Wallerstein believes the capitalist system has several problems due to which it shall crumble in the future. However he also gave reasons as to why this system continues to exist for example because of the powerful leading dominating people. Until now there is no hint that the capitalist system will fail, especially since supported by the western powerful countries. We shall have to wait and see if this happens.
ReplyDelete