Immanuel Wallerstein, a renowned sociologist, draws a
historic account that explains the rise of capitalism in the modern era.
Starting from the feudal era, he outlines the path that led to the development
of the modern capitalist states as we see them today. Outlining the rise of
capitalism, Wallerstein highlights the functioning of the modern capitalist
system, explaining the reasons that he predicts will lead to its decline and
subsequently the rise of “social states”. The feudal economies seemed to thrive
on rather simplistic economic concepts, therefore the chances for their growth were
rather limited. The rise of capitalism according to Wallerstein can be traced
in the demise of Feudal economies, which could only grow to a certain extent,
therefore a much more complex, accommodating economic system was needed to cope
up with the growth of the economies. Capitalism provided this opportunity
through increased trade, industrialization and specialization. This, according
to Wallerstein led to the creation of states that could be divided into three
categories; The Exploiters (The Core), The Exploited (The Peripherals) and the
In-Betweens (Semi-Peripherals). States that held powerful militia and were at
latter stages of growth, constituted the core, these states needed a large
resource base to cater to their economic growth. The peripheral states were the
exploited states that used to supply these resources, often forcibly (EIC in
India, African Slavery) to the Core states. There are no fixed positions,
according to Wallerstein, in the system, therefore core states can decline as
in the case of Russia to Semi-peripherals, and States can rise to become
hegemons. This, however does not limit the exploitation of the peripheral
states. Wallerstein defines the world economy of today as capitalist, outlining
their functioning, he argues the lack of a socialist system, but does provide
reasons for its establishment by highlighting the conflicts that the Modern
Capitalist system has, this conflict is perhaps the main reason why capitalism,
according to Wallerstein may give way to a “better” system.
Fine summary, but very little analysis. I'd be interested to hear if you actually agreed or disagreed with Wallerstein's conclusions.
ReplyDelete