Wallerstein’s world systems theory is definitely an
interesting and thought provoking concept. He classifies states into three
kinds in order to explain the extent to which states are dependent upon one
another. Core states are well developed nations and examples include the USA
and Britain, whereas periphery states are under developed, third world states
such as Pakistan and Africa. A third tier of states is called the semi-periphery
states. These states are in the process of developing and typically include the
BRICS states – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Furthermore, the
core states exploit the periphery states by extracting their raw materials only
to use them for manufactured goods which are sold at high prices in periphery
states. The semi periphery states constitute the middle stratum which exploit
periphery states and are exploited by the core states. Ultimately, the level of
development of a state determines what kind it is. The fact that Wallerstein’s
theory is sufficient to classify all states of the world into three categories
can be appreciated.
Drawing from prior knowledge on this theory, Wallerstein’s
theory explains how capitalism is actually sustained in the world system and
cannot be replaced by socialism or communism. The proletariat of the core
states is very different from the proletariat of the periphery states. The core
states exploit the proletariat of the periphery states which in turn increases
the living standards of their own proletariat. As a result, the core proletariat
become pacified with the system and do not revolt against it. Thus, the two
proletariat’s have nothing in common to unite them, which makes a socialist
revolution very unlikely.
The tradition of extracting resources from periphery states and using them to one's own advantage has been seen in negative light by many but it is important to note that these activities prove to be advantageous to the native statesmen too. Roads are constructed for transportation and employment is created which helps the people get paid and improves the infrastructure of the country. Thus, both the parties gain in some ways from the utilization of resources.
ReplyDeleteLaila, you do realize this is the argument that the British used to justify their colonization of India? In fact, this is the argument used by all colonizing powers to justify their exploitation of the rest of the world.
DeleteExcellent post, particularly the part where you note difference between the proletariat in core states versus the proletariat in periphery states.
ReplyDelete