The theory analyses the world while focusing on states and assumes that there is only one path of evolutionary development for countries. Wallerstein traces the rise of the capitalist world-economy from the sixteenth century. In Wallerstein's view, the rise of capitalism was an outcome of the protracted crisis of feudalism. Western countries utilized its advantages and gained control over most of the world economy, presiding over the development and spread of industrialization and capitalist economy, indirectly resulting in unequal development across the world. In the end, the writer talks about the capitalist system which is global in nature but it facing too many challenges and it is also self-destructing. This theory faced criticism for being too focused on economy and too state centric. Theda Skocpol believes that the interstate system is far from being a simple superstructure of the capitalist world economy: "The international states system as a transnational structure of military competition was not originally created by capitalism. Throughout modern world history, it represents an analytically autonomous level [..of] world capitalism, but [is] not reducible to it." (Skocpol 1979)
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
Session 16: Capitalism and Wallerstein!
The theory analyses the world while focusing on states and assumes that there is only one path of evolutionary development for countries. Wallerstein traces the rise of the capitalist world-economy from the sixteenth century. In Wallerstein's view, the rise of capitalism was an outcome of the protracted crisis of feudalism. Western countries utilized its advantages and gained control over most of the world economy, presiding over the development and spread of industrialization and capitalist economy, indirectly resulting in unequal development across the world. In the end, the writer talks about the capitalist system which is global in nature but it facing too many challenges and it is also self-destructing. This theory faced criticism for being too focused on economy and too state centric. Theda Skocpol believes that the interstate system is far from being a simple superstructure of the capitalist world economy: "The international states system as a transnational structure of military competition was not originally created by capitalism. Throughout modern world history, it represents an analytically autonomous level [..of] world capitalism, but [is] not reducible to it." (Skocpol 1979)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
One thinks that Wallerstein's theory has its most significance, when it discusses the role of economy and the spread of capitalist forces around the world. It is right to say that economic-centric argument might not explain the whole working of the international structure. However, in the period of sixteenth to eighteenth century that Wallerstein used in his analysis, the economy surely provided a great driving force for the change in the political and military realms of the states.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Ali. Economic change led to political change and both played a major role in transforming Europe into the core of the world economy.
ReplyDelete