This article by Immanuel Wallerstein is the first that we’ve
read by someone whose primary field is sociology, not International Relations.
Wallerstein presents his World Systems Theory which is a categorization of the
different countries in the world into three divisions, each of which performs a
different task.
Taking a Marxist view of the international system, he talks
about how imperialism and capitalism came about. The move from imperial to
feudal to capitalist systems is well defined. Industrialization was fueled by
colonization and the need for raw materials from poor countries. Capitalist
thought grew and there was a new era of consumerism across the world. This rise
of consumerism eventually lead to decolonization as markets needed to be free
from imperial rule to function properly. With all this in mind, Wallerstein
introduces the new world system organized into three classes: the core, the
semi-periphery and the periphery.
The core is the technologically advanced countries like
Britain which caught their stride in the Industrial Revolution and developed
new technology and methods of production. They buy from or sometimes exploit
the periphery which comprises states with a low skill work force and lack of
technology. The semi-periphery lies in between; it dominates the peripheral
states but is economically subservient to the core. It is a Marxist view of the
international system whereby the periphery and the semi-periphery are the
proletariat and the core is the bourgeoisie.
The first thing that came to my mind when reading this piece
was the striking similarity to Suzanne Collin’s Hunger Games series. The
Capital or the core is the strong one which has a large consumer base which
exploits the further districts (districts 5 to 12) i.e. the periphery; for raw
materials. However, there are slightly more dominant districts which constitute
the semi-periphery: Districts 1 -4. These districts have more technology and
higher skilled labour than the periphery does but they are ultimately all
serving the end of the Capital. It’s even more striking that the core is called
The Capital. And in the end, Katniss brings about a revolution to bring down
the Capitalist system.
Wallerstein predicts that there will be the creation of a socialist
world order which he will come from a long struggle. He makes it sound like
capitalism is a ticking time bomb and that the world will ultimately arrive at
socialism, but maybe he should be more careful since Marx’s original ideas
failed to show in the international system. There’s a reason why Fukuyama wrote
The End of History. Wallerstein’s ideas seem sensible on paper but there are
always ups and downs in the new world system. Who knows, maybe we’ll have to
call Fukuyama about a sequel.
If only political scientists would also use pop culture references in their readings, International Relations would be so much easier to understand.
ReplyDeleteThis was an interesting read.
I concur!
DeleteGood post and you always manage to provide a pop culture twist to your pieces in some way, shape, or form. But while you appear to embrace Fukuyama's end of history, ascension of worldwide liberal, capitalist democracy as a given, I remain unconvinced that this system will remain in perpetuity. The system essentially collapsed in 2008-09 with the financial crisis, but was saved by all of the central bankers who are committed to the current capitalist system. But will the system be able to survive a second collapse? And what happens when the 99% become too fed up with how the system has become? Could it be like Gotham under Bane's rule?
ReplyDelete