Immanuel Wallerstein is renowned for developing the
best-version of the world systems approach. World system analysis is basically
a multidisciplinary approach, which analyses world history and social change on
a macro scale. This approach, unlike other concepts in international relations,
focuses on the world systems instead of states.
Two world systems have been explained in the article; world
economy and world empires. Wallerstein has used the following analogy in
explaining the concept of world systems approach, ‘It has the characteristics
of an organism, in that is has a lifespan over which its characteristics change
in some respects and remain stable in others’. He explains how world economy
has been more prevalent and dominating over the course of history and how over
the last few centuries, power (hegemony) has shifted from Netherlands to
Britain and currently the United States. The world system has not only expanded
geographically but has also strengthened economically.
Carlos A. Martínez Vela, a famous social scientist, has critically
analyzed the piece and has further elaborated Wallerstein’s concept about world
systems. He has traced the rise of capitalist world economy from 1450-1640. According
to Carlos A. Martínez-Vela, Wallerstein’s view about the rise of capitalism was
‘a contingent, not inevitable’ outcome of the lengthened span of feudalism from
1290-1450.
Wallerstein’s views were received with criticism, most
notable from Marx. However, the author’s stance is fairly reasonable and he has
backed his arguments with reason and evidence. He refuses to refer to this
approach as just a ‘theory’ and calls it ‘knowledge movement’ instead. He has
explained how industrialization in Europe has led to unequal development across
the globe and that maybe, for capitalism, the end is near.
http://web.mit.edu/esd.83/www/notebook/WorldSystem.pdf
Love the last line of the reading. It is so beautifully written, almost like poetry *-*
ReplyDeleteMishal, I really like how you have used Carlos A. Martínez Vela's critique of the piece by Wallerstein. The later focuses upon the economics behind the world-systems.
ReplyDeleteGood post and I agree with Mahnoor that bringing in Vela's comments was useful. However, Marx was not a critic of Wallerstein, as he was long dead by the time Wallerstein published this piece in the 1970s.
ReplyDeleteAlso, is the end of capitalism actually nigh? Will socialism really take its place?