Immanuel Wallerstein in this week’s reading, takes us
through the course of history to describe how the world system and capitalism
from evolving through centuries, now have a strong footing in the international
system presently. In almost every course that we study, in the discipline of
Political Science, Wallerstein’s World Systems Theory is not only redundant,
but it is imperative in understanding how the countries work and how they are
placed in the world today. This theory shows the pragmatic application of
Capitalism as a leading ideology presently that dictates the functioning of the
world.
The World Systems Theory divides the labor/states into three
distinct categories. You have your cores that dominate the scenario due to
their level of development and their effects on the production, output and
levels of consumption. The cores have no apparent direct challenge and are the
strong nations who have firmly held their place in the international system.
The cores are followed by the periphery, the group of countries that are
exploited by the core. The under developed nations of the world can be grouped
under this umbrella and they are countries who we can say work and provide the
core with primary materials to keep it happy. An analogy can be drawn between
the Karl Marx class structure theory, whereby the core can be assumed to be the
Proletariat force exploiting the periphery i.e. the Bourgeoisie. A group of
countries further, form the semi periphery, which in other words can be called
the developing nations. Semi periphery nations are classified under BRICS (Brazil,
Russia, India, China and South Africa) who are upcoming nations. This
classification of the world into three groups though seems very crude, but in
reality this division exists quite prominently.
Wallerstein furthermore describes or what looks like he
complains that there is no Socialist order in the world presently and that
Capitalism trumps every other form of order, however due to the persistent
shortcomings and flaws, the death of capitalism is near as he claims Marx has predicted. What he doesn’t know sadly is that even though capitalism does have
its weaknesses and shortcomings, the roots of capitalism seem to have been dug
deeply into the world structure today. To rip of the roots and to change the
structure, it requires a lot of strength and dedication, which does not seem
quite possible in the near future. Even though true hardcore capitalism does
not exist in the world in practical application, countries that dominate the
world order, for e.g. USA, Germany, UK, China and India are some examples that
have undertaken Capitalism quite efficaciously and their strength cannot be combated easily. What we can wait to see is when
will Socialism gather enough momentum and courage to come combat Capitalism. On
a personal note however, I do not see Capitalism’s demise anytime soon, it
might get reformed, but not abolished.
Hamza, your discussion on the core, periphery and semi periphery is apt and helps understand your argument. Your analysis of the end of the capitalist system is correct because this world system has been present and is such a pertinent part of the global arena, that is unfathomable for it's demise. There have been different forms of capitalism that have been present and it is the evolution that allows it to adapt to the different epochs of history, and the end cannot be seen in the near future
ReplyDeleteI agree that capitalism will be around with us for the foreseeable future, but I do think that the need for reform is critical. We need less American-style capitalism, but in terms of practical alternatives, I think different mixed economic systems are needed depending on local needs.
ReplyDeleteThat's true and that's the beauty of capitalism, that the principles stay essentially the same, and the practical implementation differs according to geographical location and the leaders that are in power.
Delete