Morgenthau’s
contribution towards the understanding of the realist theory is very useful. His
work focuses on the fundamental principles of political realism and lays a
foundation for those wanting to study the field of International Relations from
a realist’s perspective.
He
goes on to compare realism with idealism which is the belief
that reality as we can know it is basically mentally constructed and immaterial.
Hence humans have morals and are good creatures who wish for each others well
being. However, realism states the exact opposite. Realists believe that humans
are selfish beings who do immoral acts and hence Morgenthau believes that the
world should be viewed from realist lens as it enables us to look at things
more rationally. However, I do not entirely agree with this idea because it is
hard to define what exactly comes under the category of rationality because the
term reality is also a product of socially constructed ideas.
Moreover, he suggested that instead of looking at
the intentions of people or statesmen we should look at their actions and their
capability of leading the nation and making political decisions. He goes on to
say that ‘[p]olitical realism refuses to identify
moral aspirations of a particular nation’. However, I do
not agree with this phenomenon because morals determine intentions which
eventually lead to actions. For example, Hitler managed to make Germany strong
after it had been stripped off most of its resources, land and army under the
Treaty of Versailles which shows that he was capable of leading the country. However,
he was over ambitious and wanted to make Germany a super power and he believed
the only way this could be done was through conquering more land. Therefore,
because of his obsession with lebensraum (living space) he went on to invade Czechoslovakia
which caused the Second World War.
Therefore, from this it can be concluded
that one’s intentions do matter as they influence policy making. Therefore, in
conclusion I believe that although Morgenthau has given good arguments in favor
of realism, some of his points contradict one another and give rise to
criticism.
It was Hitler's invasion of Poland - not Czechoslovakia - that led to start of WWII.
ReplyDeleteI agree that some or Morgenthau's points appear contradictory. That being said, he paints a particular picture of human morality and applies that to how we can understand the international system.