In ‘The Rise and Future Demise of World Capitalist System:
Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Immanuel Wallenstein presents the ‘World
Systems’ theory where states are categorized as core, semi periphery and
periphery according to their economic and productive capabilities..
At the top of the food chain are the core states, described
as developed and industrialized states capable of both importing cheap raw
materials from the periphery and semi periphery states as well as exporting
expensive capital in the form of technology or expertise in return. The second
tier is occupied by the semi periphery states; those that have managed to
industrialize partially yet also continue to maintain an agricultural sector
while the bottom rung is occupied by the labor intensive, agriculture based
economies of the periphery states
Interestingly the periphery nations are aware that they are
being exploited by the core nations but are powerless to change the state of
affairs because the latter possess military power in addition to the desire of
the periphery nations’ leaders to maintain the domestic status quo through
ensuring they remain in power by complying with the demands of core nations, which
in turn leads to maintenance of the international status quo. Wallenstein is
also of the view that the three tiered arrangement is necessary in order to
maintain stability in the world system, an argument that is harder to prove as
compared to the first two of which countless examples can be found. The author also daringly predicts the demise
of capitalism by adapting Karl Marx’s theory regarding the eventual revolt
within a state whereby the proletariat will overthrow the bourgeoisie, to the
international system where the periphery states will ultimately rise against
and break free of the oppression of the core states. Of course such a prediction
cannot be wholly trusted or indeed dismissed given the patterns and cycles of
history but perhaps it is not as problematic to predict the decease of capitalism despite the remarkable staying power, as it is to prophesize a socialist world system in it’s place, given the
shortcomings the latter ideology has faced in practical application.
Good post and I agree that the central problem with socialism has been it implementation in practice. But democratic socialism has worked in some places. For example, see the Scandinavian countries and how well they have managed.
ReplyDelete