Norms refer to the standard behavior which are accepted as
appropriate and good by the majority of the people. Institutions, too, in a way
explain the same concept as they are a collection of rules and practices which
are applied as they are thought of as appropriate for a given group of actors
in specific situations.
The reading “International Norm Dynamics and political
Change” by Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink explore the role of norms in
the field of International Relations.
The authors believe that norms have been cardinal in the
study of Political Science since the time of Plato and Aristotle. However in
the 1970s and 1980s, this began to change as the political scientists began to
rely more on scientific methods as they were more tangible and quantifiable. It
was at this time too, that microeconomics was greatly used in the study of
International Relations. However after this period, we see that the trend has
reversed with the normative issues becoming important.
During the 1970s and 1980s, when the study of norms fell out
of favor and more emphasis was placed on scientific theories, one advantage
that this had was that methods of research design and theoretical clarity were
strengthened. This had the impact that now when the normative issues are taken
into consideration to describe something, causal relationships are clearly
defined and substantiated in terms of empirical research and past events.
While the normative concerns have made a comeback into the
field of International Relations, they have changed for the better and
certainly give an alternative perspective on things and events which is not
explored in other theories, for example, Realism and Liberalism.
Decent post, but remember normative issues came to fore among some IR scholars in the 90s, but not all. That being said, norms are now recognized as something worth considering by students of IR.
ReplyDelete