Morgenthau in his article the ‘Great
Debate’ explains the self interested, power seeking nature of states as a
byproduct of the basic differences between human nature and politics. He goes
on to arrange interests into three groupings namely sub national, other
national and supranational, which in turn influence the national interest.
Morgenthau in his article the ‘Great
Debate’ explains the self interested, power-seeking nature of states as a
byproduct of the basic differences between human nature and politics. However ‘national
interest’ is then open to manipulation by those in power or important interest
groups. Those in power have tools at their disposable such as a biased media to
influence the citizenry to accept that the interests being promoted by them are
indeed the national interests. This is a powerful weapon, which can be used to
justify the United States interventions and invasions into other countries,
which have been portrayed as ‘ hostile’ or ‘threatening.’
Morgenthau is of the view that events in
history need to be analyzed both logically and critically to help understand
the foreign policy of the United States, including the presentation to the
public of foreign policy rooted in moral grounds, in order to gain mass consent
for the interests of those in power. Too often a states national interests
cannot align with the global interests, due to the fact that the latter are
usually determined by the ruling bloc and also because it Is the nature of
nation states to compete for power and self preservation.
The critical problem of national interests not aligning with global interests is what has led to the 'tragedy of the commons'.
ReplyDeleteMost of the time it is the hegemonic state that ends up deciding what global interests really are and these interests contradict with the local interests of states which then makes these states reluctant to pursue policies dictated by international forums.
ReplyDelete