Allison and Halperin in their article provide us with a lens
to understand foreign relations and the relations between different states. Who
makes the decisions, whether they are individual actors or whether it’s the state
itself and what influences their decision making? These are the questions that
arise in our minds and the authors by the help of a “game” make us understand foreign
policy and decision making. For me this week’s reading was even more exciting,
because I have always wondered who makes the final decision, when we talk about
let’s say Pakistan and India almost getting engaged in a war, is it the entire
population of a country who wants the war or are they few top notch influential
people in the state who make the final decision? With the help of the Bureaucratic
Politics Model, a lot of things were revealed to me.
The game talks about senior and junior players. As the name
suggests, the senior players are those who dominate in the international arena
and junior players follow the seniors and implement their decisions. A more
practical example could be when we take the US as a senior player presently in
the international arena and countries such as Pakistan can be the junior
players. With negotiations and interests being measured, a lot of decisions are
made.
What we can still wonder is what leads to certain decisions
being made. Does the atmosphere in the international state system affect
decision making at the state level? Would people put the domestic problems at
the back burner to focus on more international arena? Would policies be made
based on how other states are acting? It all comes down to a zero sum game, one
person’s gain is another ones loss and vice versa. An irony I’d like to point
out is that even though decisions are called state decisions, but in reality,
it is the views and beliefs of a few individuals working together who make
decisions for the state. Decisions are made to seem as if they are decisions of
the state, but in reality they are decisions of people. Even though the Bureaucratic
Politics Model helps us understand the decision making pattern but it has its strength
and weaknesses, it is made to seem to be too simplistic, but the real
application can be quite complex when we want to predict the behaviors of the
states when it comes to their foreign policy.
Anytime a reading is "exciting" then I think we're on the right track and headed for a good discussion tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I like how you took the bureaucratic model and made it an international one with "senior" player being the U.S. and "junior" player being Pakistan. This is an interesting way to think about how policies are enacted in the international system.