The thought that the American foreign policy is based on “humanitarianism
and pacifism” is nothing but ridiculous. Morgenthau argues fervently that the foreign
policy is based on balance of power and I completely agree with his argument.
Since the last few years, the United States of America has
undertaken the task to preach its views regarding world peace and its love for
humanity. Its actions on the other hand are entirely opposite of what it
actually preaches. All policies that are made and that have been undertaken by
America are for its own selfish interests and for the maintenance of balance of
power and its superiority. Whether its
been the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan or the present day slowly creeping into
Syria, America has always had its motives. Deception has trumped all other
motives for the USA to carry out its foreign policy. The wars which are being
fought over “humanitarian” reasons and as a bid to rid the world of “war and
tyranny,” what is appalling is that the US itself is spreading nothing but war
all over the world. This is a perfect dichotomy of what USA’s foreign policy is
and how differently does it preach.
I believe that one of the major factors for USA’s foreign policy
deception could be the rising threat of other countries such as China, gaining power and
momentum in the international arena. It all comes down to national interest
which the USA always protects unabashedly. It keeps conducting military operations
in the sake for humanitarian interventions just to show the entire
international system that it still is one of the major hegemonies in the system
and it’s a mere show case of its military capabilities to the entire world. The
base of all this, can be linked to Realism, as once again the US is just
supporting the assumption that states are selfish institutes, all fighting for survival.
I completely agree with Hamza that countries like America take certain decisions and steps only to show that they still hold power and there is no other motive. Secondly, they are scared of the fact that another country is developing and they might over power them so they take certain measures to counter that.
ReplyDeleteWell argued piece. I like how you highlight the U.S.'s sanctimonious policies. Hence realism can be used to accurately interpret U.S. foreign policy.
ReplyDelete