The phrase “balance of power” has been
a part of many theories to define power politics since the birth of International
Relations. Different realists and historians describe balance of power
differently. Ernest Hass in this article has showed the
different understanding of balance of power.
Perfect Equilibrium of power between
the states as a meaning of balance of power is quite self-explanatory. But
apart from this, peace time and distribution of power in international arena are
also associated with the phrase as shown in the article. People usually associate
peace time to balance of power or equal distribution of power because “no state
wants to destroy itself as the other party is equally powerful”. I agree with explanation
however we forget to realize that balance of power gave birth to power politics
as well. If we see the war between Sparta and Athens, the underlying cause of
war was “the growth of Athenian power and the fear which this caused in Sparta”.
After Persian war, Athens grew powerful in terms of military and wealth. Sparta
declared war on Athens and the result was very destructive for both. Sparta emerged victorious, while the constant
fighting left Athens bankrupt, exhausted and demoralized. This was a
result of power politics between Athens and Sparta because of the change in
distribution of power. Though both nation were strong and therefore the results
were quite predictable as well, both go on war.
Ernest
Hass’s article allows us to open our minds to digest different concepts behind
the concept of balance of power in international politics.
While I agree that there was a competition between Athens and Sparta that led to conflict, why did you feel the need to plagiarize this quote, "Sparta emerged victorious, while the constant fighting left Athens bankrupt, exhausted and demoralized." Haven't we talked enough about academic integrity? Please come see me about this.
ReplyDelete