In his work ‘The Tragedy of Great Power Politics’, Mearsheimer
puts forward some basic ideas about
the international system on upon which his theory of ‘Offensive Realism’ is
based. The fact that he does not use complicated vocabulary or difficult
sentences makes his writing more effective and easy to read. He is able to
convey his message clearly and effectively without leaving the reader in any
doubt
Moreover, Mearsheimer explains explain events in the
international system by stressing upon the importance of structural factors
such as anarchy and how power is distributed amongst states and political
actors. He also acknowledges the fact that states have the ability to engulf other
weaker states. This is because of uncertainty in the global environment. Due to
this lack of surety states end up adopting hostile policies towards others
which then creates international tension. It also leads to states piling up on
arms and ammunition which then further threaten other countries around it. Increasing
uncertainty can cause states to doubt each others intentions and can lead to preemptive attacks. For example, the 6-Day war in the Middle East was caused because
Israel took preemptive action and attacked Egypt. This shows the extent to
which uncertainty in the International environment can affect the decisions
made by countries.
Furthermore, Offensive Realism recognizes that the
reason behind decline in the number of wars over the years is because states
have realized the costs of war. Also, states are aware of the concept of ‘balance
of power’ and they know they cannot completely emerge as being the solely
victorious party in the event of a war.
Lastly, Mearsheimer also questions the Liberal
approach that is adopted by many scholars and challenges its authority towards
comprehending International Relations. He also differentiates between the
different forms of realist approaches that exist which makes it easier to
answer the question of why states desire power.
Have states really realized the costs of war, or have certain technologies - such as nuclear weapons - raised the cost to such an extent that wars between states are seen as cataclysmic? Solid analysis, but I would have loved to see more connections between theory and reality as you demonstrated with the example of the 6-day war.
ReplyDelete