John Mearsheimer in his book “The Tragedy of Great
Power Politics” highlights that the primary concern of the states is to survive
but due to the absence of an authority that maintains peace in the world,
states are forced to help themselves. However, this can be refuted that
international organizations such as United Nations and International Court of
Justice are present and functioning to prevent wars around the world. But, we
have already discussed in the class that these organizations too can be
manipulated to work in the interests of powerful participants. For example, Sir
quoted that USA finances UN substantially so it can be assumed that UN would be
particularly interested in serving the United States of America since they are
dependent on them.
Moreover, Mearsheimer says that in the anarchic
system that prevails in the international arena, states pursue policies to gain
more power and become hegemons because they believe that is the only feasible option
to secure themselves from perceived threats. They do this by expanding their
military capabilities coupled with economic and geographical expansion. An example
of this can be the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Israeli’s committed genocide
in Gaza in 2014, killing thousands of women and children on the pretext that Hamas
provoked Israel to attack Gaza. A similar example of this can be the Russian annexation
of Crimea, internationally recognized Ukrainian territory. In spite of
condemnation of this illegal acquisition of territory by the NATO, UN failed to
prevent it proving that indeed the states have to help themselves as mentioned
earlier.
Well states do operate in a self-help system, but according to Mearsheimer, they primarily aim to maximize their power. Hence, Israel's actions in Gaza and Russia's actions in Ukraine can be seen as attempts by these states to maximize their power. Also, just as a point of technical clarification - although Israel did in fact commit "crimes against humanity" during its 2014 destruction of Gaza, its actions do not constitute "genocide", at least from a strictly international legal perspective.
ReplyDelete