Finnemore and Sikkink in their
article, "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change" argue
that the rules and practices that define the state behavior are significant to
be theoretically analyzed, because their change could explain the reasons for
alteration in expectations, interests and beliefs of states. They also maintain
that it is worthy to identify the origins of the norms that exist in world
politics and to understand the elements that constitute them. They suggest that
all the international norms were first created in the domestic settings of the
states, and when the struggle to endorse these norms in the routine affairs of
people became successful, these norms were adjusted in the international arena.
They mention that a particular number of states comply with a norm to make it
internationally acceptable.
One believes that this paper peeks
into the theoretical dimensions of norm formation in the realm of international
politics and suggests that one must be clear about the understanding of norms
so that empirical research on the effects of the norms could be carried
out adequately. For instance, the authors clarify the distinction between a
norm and an institution. They believe that scholars use norm and institution
interchangeably, but that is incorrect. One agrees to their distinction when
they demonstrate that a norm is a single appropriate rule about a certain
behavior. However, an institution is a collection of rules and practices that
renders appropriateness to various behaviors.
The paper has also interesting
insights on the norm promoters that provide a framework to think about how
norms that states adopt are the creation of certain people, who manufacture
these norms according to their value-system and moral principles. One maintains
that this brings to the conclusion that in the international arena the
preconceived notions of states for each other are not merely organic, rather
these notions depend upon the perspectives of people that have certain notions
about other states.
Good post. The norm dynamic cycle is an interesting one and does indeed play a role in IR. How to define its exact role remains up for debate, but norms will continue to play a role in shaping the international system.
ReplyDelete