Session 3: The
Long Road To Theory
The realist world is a Frozen
universe – Do you want to build a new theory?
Professor
Morgenthau’s theory of realism in the context of international relations
provides an interesting narrative of the means of power and how a struggle for
power dominates politics as well as the international system. It especially
does not hold true for international relations where power is usually the tool
by which some particular goal is achieved and the acts of aggression and any
such power plays are usually dominated by some deeper consideration than just a
desire for more power.
Moreover, we
can consider power as a sort of justification for one’s own morality; be it nationalistic
or religious or even humanitarian. Power can be exercised in order to impose a
certain religious doctrine or in defense of your country in the form of a
preemptive strike. In these cases, the realist theory fails to provide an
explanation as to what the system of international relations really entails
because power is only being exerted in lieu of a particular means to achieve a
particular end. The realist theory is in desperate need to be improved upon by better
research methods and perhaps a completely different approach.
Realism in
itself is limiting the international system to be composed mostly of a power
struggle. Power monism needs to be approached in a more goal oriented manner.
Better empirical research and rigorous methods of analysis can help achieve a
better, more overarching theory about international relations. Qualitative and
quantitative research methods from sociology and history can help form a better
core for understanding international relations which will also be more flexible
in terms of developing one overarching model of international relations. A more
flexible model for international relations with its base in strict social
science methods rather than in policy making is the way to move forward with
international relations. As for realism, I think it is about time that we Let It Go.
I think you'll find realism to be considerably more flexible and sophisticated than how Hoffmann explained it. Regardless, I don't think that there can only be one overarching model to study IR. We need a plethora of models. Methods that are both qualitative and quantitative will help, including those from other disciplines.
ReplyDeleteIR will continue to develop and hopefully you'll have a more holistic understanding of it by the end of this course.