Herz in his article talks about the concept of Realist
Liberalism. At first this strikes as quite an interesting concept which unites
both the leading theories of international relations, Realism and Liberalism,
but one should also consider how pragmatic this concept really is.
While Realism talks about anarchy and the selfish nature of
the human beings, it is cruder in nature, Liberalism talks about peace and
harmony through the structure of efficacious institutions. Both these theories
have been at loggerheads since their inceptions, they talk about two different
approaches to International Relations. Hertz’s idea of Realist Liberalism is
defined as the “theory and practice of the realizable idea.” This idea put
forward looks to combine the basic practical ideas of both Realism and
Liberalism. While its “less glamorous than Political Idealism, it is also less
utopian, while less emotional, it is also less sober.” Through this theory,
Herz through this approach, tries to settle down the differences between the
two leading approaches and we can say he tries to mend the gap between the two
approaches which lie down on the opposite ends of the spectrum of the theories
to conduct your relations in the international system.
While all this sounds good when heard, I feel this is
nothing but a hasty way of finding the easy way out. Combining two leading rival
theories is like living in a world of denial. Yes I agree if successful, this
can be a very efficacious way to solve the problems of the International system
and can aid in making very efficient decisions, but this looks very hard to
actually combine. Not only the two schools are staunch believers of their
views, you can’t just take the strong points from the two and merge them
together. I don’t know why but I feel somehow this is a mockery of the
discipline of International Relations. There will be several shortcomings of
both the theories, which will hinder the development of the development of
Realist Liberalism. Though I’m not against the idea completely, but I feel this
concept needs to be dealt with in more depth and Herz should have given
instances where this theory can be applied to solve the pertaining issues.
I totally agree with you! Furthermore, a good theory must challenge assumptions and norms, and articulate new ideas and visions.
ReplyDeleteA mockery of the discipline of IR you say? I enjoyed that comment immensely. Look a lot of these scholars are just trying to put out ideas and see if they stick. Clearly you don't think this one works and I totally understand why. Good post.
ReplyDelete