In ‘The Long Road to Theory’ Hoffman is of the view that
international relations as a social science has been lagging behind the other
sciences due to unnecessary complexity and lack of cohesiveness in both
application and derivation of theories. Interestingly Hoffman is critical of
Realism and believes that power cannot be confined to a specific delineation, which
happens to be one of the core beliefs of Realism. He also believes that of the
three kinds of theory ie. Normative, Policy and Empirical, the latter has been
most neglected. This has led to an over reliance on qualitative data which has
in turn created problems for the practical application of theories of
international relations especially on a global policy making level. There is a
need to fuse qualitative research with quantitative methods since the latter is
usually not a victim of subjectivity, which often proves to be the failing of
the former. Since the field of international relations is growing in both
stature and relevance in the increasingly interconnected global sphere it is of
paramount importance that practical theories be developed for the current global
conditions since some theories of the past may be unable to explain the trends
of the present or the future. Instead of completely discarding old theories, a
better approach would be to work on them and rectify their shortcomings whether
theoretical or empirical.
I like a lot of your points, but I disagree with this one: "There is a need to fuse qualitative research with quantitative methods since the latter is usually not a victim of subjectivity, which often proves to be the failing of the former." How do you know quantitative methods aren't subjective? I would argue that they are just as subjective, but are given the imprimatur of objectivity, which gives them more respectability even when it is undeserved. Qualitative methods at least accept their subjectivity, while quantitative methods often times hide behind a veil of claimed "objectivity".
ReplyDelete