Waltz focuses on 3 main reasons for going to war, which are
due to man, the state, or the structure of the state. However not only does waltz
oversimplify several conditions that exist in the world, but also leaves out
several potential causes for war.
One potential cause of war missed is religion and culture. From
WW2 in which Hitler killed thousands of Jews because he believed that Germans
were a superior race and wanted to make Germany a land of the elite race, to today’s
conflict between Israel and Palestine over a land that they both claim lay to
but over different reasons, none being willing to listen to the other due to
their cultural and religious differences.
Another potential cause of war that Walts conveniently
leaves out are the economic factors. Several wars have been fought to gain some
economic benefit. Several issues have sparked up between countries over some
economic benefit (such as an oil field) that both lay claim to, or even one
country attacking another country to claim that countries oil fields for its
own benefit (for example it is claimed by many that US attacked Iraq for its oil,
another example is the Iraq-Kuwait war that many believed happened because Iraq
wanted to control Kuwait’s Oil fields). Others economic factors that have led
to war are mineral deposits or even water.
History is another reason for war that was missed by Waltz. There
have been several wars between states because either they were enemies in the
past, or one state was part of another larger state which then got separated.
For example there are some who believe that Iraq invaded Kuwait 1990 because
Kuwait was once part of Iraq but got separated by the British. Another recent conflict
example is that of between Russia and Ukraine, with one reason why it started
was because Ukraine was part of Russia in the past.
Reasons for why a war starts is a complicated issue that Waltz has not only oversimplified, but has also left out several of the important reasons.
Reasons for why a war starts is a complicated issue that Waltz has not only oversimplified, but has also left out several of the important reasons.
Don't you think when Waltz talks about different views on nature of man, he does mention greed and his tendency to protect what is his because he does not trust others and that includes economic factors as well? And states being made up of individual men, their tendency translates into the economics factors that states wage war for?
ReplyDeleteI agree with Rida, Waltz does mention other reasons for war as well within the reason 'man'. Like he even linked the role of society and how it can cause war by shaping the decisions of a man.
ReplyDeleteAlthough I also agree with Aahsan that Waltz focuses on very few issues of why war takes place and has really simplified it to the 3 or 4 reasons.
Waltz does talk about how man is greedy and has a tendency to protect what he considers is his. But how does this translate into attacking some other states to take control of their economic factors (factors which are not his). This would mean that man is an aggressor looking to gain as much as he can for himself while not caring at all for anyone else. This would translate into states being evil looking to control everything (economic factors, even those that are not theirs) while leaving nothing for anyone else. I might have missed it but i do not think waltz mentions anything as such.
ReplyDeleteI like your attempt to highlight areas of conflict that appear to fall outside of Waltz's typology. You highlight religion and culture, economic factors, and history as additional causal factors of war. But couldn't we fit these within the categories that Waltz lays out? For example, religion and culture could be deemed to be at the "man" level of analysis. Economic and historical factors could be looked at on the "state" level of analysis.
ReplyDeleteOf course Waltz's typology is not perfect. But just as with any theory, he tries to simplify complex relationships in attempt to better understand issues related to war and peace. That is the ultimate utility of this piece.